@pcarranza Shouldn't we also ship this with Omnibus? If so I'd rather have us add it to Omnibus first instead of again setting things up manually. Looking at past experiences it usually takes too long to get rid of those manual setups.
@yorickpeterse you are actually bringing a really good point: we should only use what we ship in Omnibus.
Unless we get someone up in the chain of command vetting this. @sitschner do you think it makes sense to investigate this monitoring solution to prevent outages originating in PGBouncer before pushing it into the package or should we just push it into the package and hope for the best?
Obviously we want to ship what we use and use what we ship. However in there I think we should also make sure it works before we ship it.
We have to at least test it before shipping. @yorickpeterse I understand this will cause duplication of work, but that is better than shipping something that doesn't work or worse, causes issues to users.
I will be focusing more on database tasks and think this should be handed off to @jtevnan or @jarv or some other victim more experienced with chef automation.