when editing a dropdown, but not changing anything you end up in an ugly state:
the hover-over state for the subscribe and other buttons are veeery subtle
the collapse button needs some sort of hover-over state
the reference gets shortened. This kind of misses the point ;-) TBH I think we can get rid of this, as we generate them automatically, but we should at least show it all.
the minimized sidebar is not functional. The copy button doesn't do anything
weight disappeared! It's only visible in the minimized sidebar
Designs
Child items
...
Show closed items
Linked items
0
Link issues together to show that they're related or that one is blocking others.
Learn more.
When collapsed, the RSS icon, which I guess represents subscription, should show the subscription status with a tooltip, and work as a toggle link.
Let's show status in tooltip 4sure, as for toggle, I do agree that clicking on it should subscribe/unsubscribe a user, but we need to show the update in the tooltip : like on hover -> tooltip "unsubscribed" - > click - > tooltip "subscribed"
The pasteboard icon for the cross-reference link should also work as a button to copy it.
It makes sense only for chrome, as auto copy does not work for safari, but still yes please.
It would be nice if the assignee icon showed the person's name in a tooltip. It could also show their avatar.
@DouweM if someone is assigned, avatar is there. I support idea about tooltip, as we already have it for participants heads
The milestone incorrectly has the weight icon.
It's related to Jobs's bug about loosing weight in open sidebar
The milestone name can be too long
Cut the name ! and show full name in tooltip please.
The milestone icon doesn't link.
As currently milestone icon is hidden somewhere, as soon as it will arise before our eyes, it will be supper awesome to link it, as it's in the open sidebar. Whatever is linked there and is visible in the small sidebar, it should be linked in small as well (we can't do it for labels and participants obviously)
@creamzy@jschatz1 what if we automatically collapse sidebar when you navigate to merge request -> changes tab? I think when doing code review you care about the code so it should be a main focus on such page. At least when you are from laptop.
It would be annoying to manually collapse sidebar every time you want to browse diff.
I am seeing the double scrollbars on the sidebar in Chrome 48.0.2564.103 m Windows 10. originally noted in #13477 (closed) bringing over comment as requested.
It looks like the "right-sidebar" selector in issuable.scss is set to overflow: scroll. It should really be overflow: auto or else it will always render a scrollbar even if its not needed (content big enough to fit). Switching it to auto in developer tools fixes the issue for me.
I think this is an issue with OS X's scroll bar behavior. You can change the way it works in System Preferences > General > Show scroll bars
I think @jschatz1 and I have it enabled only when scrolling, so it's not really as much of an issue for us, whereas @rspeicher and @creamzy have scrollbars on Always Show. Can you all confirm?
If "Always" is the default (I think it is? Not entirely sure) we should definitely prioritize that issue. I'm not sure which is the default, anyone want to sacrifice themselves and reset their System Preferences? :P
Oh, actually Windows has scrollbars as its default for all browsers if I remember correctly. So regardless of whether or not it's default for Mac, we should fix this. (@jschatz1 scrollbars suck, been there done that. God help you.)
The total number of issues seems to be off here (13353 of 5552 doesn't really make sense since the issue number is higher than the total number). I'm guessing that 5552 is the number of open issues, but still it would make more sense if it were either the issue number + the total number of issues or the issue position within the open issues + the total number of open issues.
The total number of issues seems to be off here (13353 of 5552 doesn't really make sense since the issue number is higher than the total number). I'm guessing that 5552 is the number of open issues, but still it would make more sense if it were either the issue number + the total number of issues or the issue position within the open issues + the total number of open issues.