Once an expiration date is assigned to an individual or group member, clarity as to the actual date of expiration is lost when only showing a relative duration. This makes it difficult to compare the "countdown timer" in GitLab vs a specified expiration date such as it would be specified in a license agreement or contract.
In my org's use-case, we are performing several thousand group-project shares that require an expiration. Seeing only the remaining relative time obscures the contract specified dates.
Proposal
On the Share project with other groups page, immediately after where the countdown time is for each individual / group share, show the actual date of expiration.
The current one doesn't look like clickable. Change the "remove" button to look like a button.
Current
Proposed
Links / references
Designs
Child items
...
Show closed items
Linked items
0
Link issues together to show that they're related or that one is blocking others.
Learn more.
@tauriedavis@sarahod : There must be many usability arguments / studies that talk about showing absolute timestamps versus relative ones in different contexts. Usually it's timestamps that happened in the past. This one is looking forward into future. Can you give us some guidance here? Show both? Show one or the other? Show one or the other upon some UX interaction? Also an opportunity to establish some GitLab app-wide design guidance if it hasn't already been done.
@victorwu (cc @tauriedavis) The problem with a relative timestamp is that it forces a user to manually calculate when the membership actually expires. From the research studies I've done so far, there have been a lot of people who use GitLab with third party contractors, customers, etc. I'd imagine most projects have an estimated completion date and subsequently, you'd potentially want to expire the memberships of contractors, customers, etc around the same date. Therefore, the ability to set and view the actual date you want the membership to expire makes complete sense.
However, it's always good to have additional visual cues as to when something is expiring. Some UX examples: a credit card on file is due to expire, the last date for ordering an item is fast approaching, a sale is ending and so on. The thing they all have in common is urgency/immediacy - they're all happening in the next few days. If you show a visual cue too far in advance it becomes redundant and doesn't prompt any action.
I'd propose showing the actual date and as the date approaches, introduce a countdown/absolute timestamp. For example, 'Expires in 7 days'. We don't necessarily know whether a user will need to take action and amend the expiry date of the membership, however, a reminder doesn't hurt.
GitLab is moving all development for both GitLab Community Edition
and Enterprise Edition into a single codebase. The current
gitlab-ce repository will become a read-only mirror, without any
proprietary code. All development is moved to the current
gitlab-ee repository, which we will rename to just gitlab in the
coming weeks. As part of this migration, issues will be moved to the
current gitlab-ee project.
If you have any questions about all of this, please ask them in our
dedicated FAQ issue.
Using "gitlab" and "gitlab-ce" would be confusing, so we decided to
rename gitlab-ce to gitlab-foss to make the purpose of this FOSS
repository more clear
I created a merge requests for CE, and this got closed. What do I
need to do?
Everything in the ee/ directory is proprietary. Everything else is
free and open source software. If your merge request does not change
anything in the ee/ directory, the process of contributing changes
is the same as when using the gitlab-ce repository.
Will you accept merge requests on the gitlab-ce/gitlab-foss project
after it has been renamed?
No. Merge requests submitted to this project will be closed automatically.
Will I still be able to view old issues and merge requests in
gitlab-ce/gitlab-foss?
Yes.
How will this affect users of GitLab CE using Omnibus?
No changes will be necessary, as the packages built remain the same.
How will this affect users of GitLab CE that build from source?
Once the project has been renamed, you will need to change your Git
remotes to use this new URL. GitLab will take care of redirecting Git
operations so there is no hard deadline, but we recommend doing this
as soon as the projects have been renamed.
Where can I see a timeline of the remaining steps?