We have a number of differently styles search boxes across the site.
Here are three different examples all on the same page:
Let's standarize all the search boxes. The magnifying glass icon should remain, even when text is entered into the search field. We should remove the clear icon, as it doesn't provide enough value.
@tauriedavis I identified one problem with changing the current solution , as the 3rd input box is a search which is going back to the server the magnifying glass is also the submit button :
So what should I implement ? I can do the unified approach and you can only submit through return ? Show both Icons ?
@timzallmann I think the unified approach makes sense, since that is what we have moved towards with the rest of our search boxes.
However, I think it does make sense for all of our search boxes to keep the mag glass icon in order to submit. @sarrahvesselov The main problem to fix here in this issue is consistency. But what are your thoughts on keeping the search icon on search fields so users can submit via the icon if they prefer? We should still have a close icon appear next to the submit field in order to keep that functionality. This may be out of scope for this issue. I could create a new one if we want to do that approach instead and it is out of scope here.
But what are your thoughts on keeping the search icon on search fields so users can submit via the icon if they prefer?
I strongly feel we should have a search icon in all search boxes. The icon is the quickest way to differentiate a search box from an input field. We also have a very low-contrast interface overall, the small addition of an icon can make the search that much easier to see.
Here is some research done on the use of a search icon. Spoiler alert! It say's they can be helpful
We should still have a close icon appear next to the submit field in order to keep that functionality. This may be out of scope for this issue. I could create a new one if we want to do that approach instead and it is out of scope here.
I agree, no need to start another issue. I think that falls within the realm of consistency.
I'm not sure the clear icon is even really necessary, actually. We could keep it, but it'll just be more visual bloat. I think the search icon is more important.
GitLab is moving all development for both GitLab Community Edition
and Enterprise Edition into a single codebase. The current
gitlab-ce repository will become a read-only mirror, without any
proprietary code. All development is moved to the current
gitlab-ee repository, which we will rename to just gitlab in the
coming weeks. As part of this migration, issues will be moved to the
current gitlab-ee project.
If you have any questions about all of this, please ask them in our
dedicated FAQ issue.
Using "gitlab" and "gitlab-ce" would be confusing, so we decided to
rename gitlab-ce to gitlab-foss to make the purpose of this FOSS
repository more clear
I created a merge requests for CE, and this got closed. What do I
need to do?
Everything in the ee/ directory is proprietary. Everything else is
free and open source software. If your merge request does not change
anything in the ee/ directory, the process of contributing changes
is the same as when using the gitlab-ce repository.
Will you accept merge requests on the gitlab-ce/gitlab-foss project
after it has been renamed?
No. Merge requests submitted to this project will be closed automatically.
Will I still be able to view old issues and merge requests in
gitlab-ce/gitlab-foss?
Yes.
How will this affect users of GitLab CE using Omnibus?
No changes will be necessary, as the packages built remain the same.
How will this affect users of GitLab CE that build from source?
Once the project has been renamed, you will need to change your Git
remotes to use this new URL. GitLab will take care of redirecting Git
operations so there is no hard deadline, but we recommend doing this
as soon as the projects have been renamed.
Where can I see a timeline of the remaining steps?