Right now, we show the pipeline and MR status in an issue that is linked to/from a MR. I propose we do the same with environments, so you can see whether a certain change / issue is live somewhere.
Designs
Child items
...
Show closed items
Linked items
0
Link issues together to show that they're related or that one is blocking others.
Learn more.
@JobV Do you envision this in a system information box, like we do for MRs, or something more subtle, like in the Related Merge Requests list, just adding content/link after the merge requests?
One concern is that there can be multiple MRs, so we'd have to extend the info box to handle that, if we went that direction. Probably easy to do since it's just more lines. But we don't have the system information box on issues at all currently.
@markpundsack I imagine a very minimal version of something like the MR box. Probably with less information, but having some buttons to quickly check something out would be very cool.
The interplay between issues and MRs is less than optimal. Several times I've looked at an issue, and even asked if there's any update, only to have someone point out that there's an MR already, and it's almost done. Partially, I'm used to GitHub where, using hub CLI, we'd usually convert issues into pull requests rather than link between them.
@markpundsack a more direct coupling is definitely something to consider. We already encourage this with the "Create branch" button in an issue. Should we do more?
Related: In issue boards, I've often wanted to know if there is a related MR already, so I imagine showing the MR number right on the issue card somewhere. I could then see adding an icon to visit the review app for that MR, all from the issue board. That might be going to far though.
I don't think that's too far @markpundsack, that sounds amazing. And then imagine having a filter for issues with/without MRs, review apps, etc. Super cool.
@victorwu looking back at this issue, I think this is still something that might be interesting. I still want to be able to see what is live where. No need to do this now, but not to close, I'd say.
GitLab is moving all development for both GitLab Community Edition
and Enterprise Edition into a single codebase. The current
gitlab-ce repository will become a read-only mirror, without any
proprietary code. All development is moved to the current
gitlab-ee repository, which we will rename to just gitlab in the
coming weeks. As part of this migration, issues will be moved to the
current gitlab-ee project.
If you have any questions about all of this, please ask them in our
dedicated FAQ issue.
Using "gitlab" and "gitlab-ce" would be confusing, so we decided to
rename gitlab-ce to gitlab-foss to make the purpose of this FOSS
repository more clear
I created a merge requests for CE, and this got closed. What do I
need to do?
Everything in the ee/ directory is proprietary. Everything else is
free and open source software. If your merge request does not change
anything in the ee/ directory, the process of contributing changes
is the same as when using the gitlab-ce repository.
Will you accept merge requests on the gitlab-ce/gitlab-foss project
after it has been renamed?
No. Merge requests submitted to this project will be closed automatically.
Will I still be able to view old issues and merge requests in
gitlab-ce/gitlab-foss?
Yes.
How will this affect users of GitLab CE using Omnibus?
No changes will be necessary, as the packages built remain the same.
How will this affect users of GitLab CE that build from source?
Once the project has been renamed, you will need to change your Git
remotes to use this new URL. GitLab will take care of redirecting Git
operations so there is no hard deadline, but we recommend doing this
as soon as the projects have been renamed.
Where can I see a timeline of the remaining steps?