Next version number?

Created by: dzaporozhets

Since we made a major changed to application (Namespaces, dropped sqlite support etc) I'd like to ask about next version number.

Should it be 4.0 or 3.2?

Created by: dzaporozhets

@Riyad @vsizov and rest of core team - I'd like to know your opinion

By Administrator on 2012-11-29T19:19:57 (imported from GitLab)

Created by: riyad

Probably also Discussions are ready by then. So I think 4.0 is more appropriate.

By Administrator on 2012-11-29T19:23:48 (imported from GitLab)

Created by: dzaporozhets

also +1 for 4.0 from me

By Administrator on 2012-11-29T19:31:10 (imported from GitLab)

Created by: vsizov

+1 for 4.0

By Administrator on 2012-11-30T09:13:47 (imported from GitLab)

Created by: SaitoWu

Yes! Go 4.0 Go!

By Administrator on 2012-11-30T09:38:53 (imported from GitLab)

Created by: AlexDenisov

It will be a glorious year end ;)

You did a really great thing. Thank you for that!

By Administrator on 2012-11-30T09:45:26 (imported from GitLab)

Created by: NARKOZ

4.0

By Administrator on 2012-11-30T10:49:25 (imported from GitLab)

Created by: kirantpatil

+1 for 4.0

By Administrator on 2012-11-30T11:03:56 (imported from GitLab)

Created by: Danpiel

Only 4.0, only hardcore. +1

By Administrator on 2012-11-30T12:50:04 (imported from GitLab)

Created by: dzaporozhets

let it be v4.0

By Administrator on 2012-11-30T14:35:26 (imported from GitLab)

Created by: Zifius

:bowtie:

By Administrator on 2012-11-30T14:41:19 (imported from GitLab)

Created by: Ving

Does it really matter? You're making great software, don't worry about numbers, just keep it going on:)

By Administrator on 2012-11-30T14:44:00 (imported from GitLab)

Created by: riyad

It matters for managing expectations. With a change of the major number you make it more obvious for users and admins alike, that there might be significant changes in setup, management, UI, handling etc.

By Administrator on 2012-11-30T15:56:50 (imported from GitLab)

Created by: mario

Are you going to implement my gollum patch too? :P

By Administrator on 2012-11-30T16:55:23 (imported from GitLab)

Created by: vsizov

we don't accept patch. You can create PR.

By Administrator on 2012-11-30T17:00:16 (imported from GitLab)

Created by: mario

Ok well, not very friendly.

By Administrator on 2012-11-30T17:02:41 (imported from GitLab)

Created by: riyad

@Mario he doesn't mean it that way, he's just not good in wording things. ;) What he meant was if you have a "patch" please submit it as a pull request (also a link would have been nice, I for example have no idea what you are referring to). :) It's just not possible for us to pick everything that comes up in conversations and put them back into the code. Please help us by patching and testing the changes and then submitting a PR.

By Administrator on 2012-11-30T17:26:45 (imported from GitLab)

Created by: vsizov

I and @randx have seen that patch. Your patch requires about 10 hours of our time. We have no time. Moreover we have said you about it.

By Administrator on 2012-11-30T17:57:43 (imported from GitLab)