Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
  1. Jul 18, 2013
    • Izaak Alpert's avatar
      Merge Request on forked projects · 3d7194f0
      Izaak Alpert authored
      The good:
      
       - You can do a merge request for a forked commit and it will merge properly (i.e. it does work).
       - Push events take into account merge requests on forked projects
       - Tests around merge_actions now present, spinach, and other rspec tests
       - Satellites now clean themselves up rather then recreate
      
      The questionable:
      
       - Events only know about target projects
       - Project's merge requests only hold on to MR's where they are the target
       - All operations performed in the satellite
      
      The bad:
      
        -  Duplication between project's repositories and satellites (e.g. commits_between)
      
      (for reference: http://feedback.gitlab.com/forums/176466-general/suggestions/3456722-merge-requests-between-projects-repos)
      
      Fixes:
      
      Make test repos/satellites only create when needed
      -Spinach/Rspec now only initialize test directory, and setup stubs (things that are relatively cheap)
      -project_with_code, source_project_with_code, and target_project_with_code now create/destroy their repos individually
      -fixed remote removal
      -How to merge renders properly
      -Update emails to show project/branches
      -Edit MR doesn't set target branch
      -Fix some failures on editing/creating merge requests, added a test
      -Added back a test around merge request observer
      -Clean up project_transfer_spec, Remove duplicate enable/disable observers
      -Ensure satellite lock files are cleaned up, Attempted to add some testing around these as well
      -Signifant speed ups for tests
      -Update formatting ordering in notes_on_merge_requests
      -Remove wiki schema update
      Fixes for search/search results
      -Search results was using by_project for a list of projects, updated this to use in_projects
      -updated search results to reference the correct (target) project
      -udpated search results to print both sides of the merge request
      
      Change-Id: I19407990a0950945cc95d62089cbcc6262dab1a8
      3d7194f0
  2. Jul 01, 2013
  3. Jun 22, 2013
  4. May 06, 2013
  5. Apr 10, 2013
  6. Apr 03, 2013
  7. Apr 01, 2013
  8. Mar 24, 2013
  9. Feb 28, 2013
  10. Feb 18, 2013
  11. Feb 17, 2013
  12. Feb 13, 2013
  13. Feb 12, 2013
  14. Jan 28, 2013
  15. Jan 14, 2013
  16. Jan 02, 2013
  17. Dec 22, 2012
  18. Dec 03, 2012
  19. Nov 23, 2012
  20. Nov 22, 2012
  21. Nov 24, 2012
  22. Nov 19, 2012
  23. Nov 13, 2012
  24. Oct 10, 2012
    • Robb Kidd's avatar
      Separate observing of Note and MergeRequests · 16ceae89
      Robb Kidd authored
      * Move is_assigned? and is_being_xx? methods to IssueCommonality
      
        This is behavior merge requests have in common with issues. Moved
        methods to IssueCommonality role. Put specs directly into
        merge_request_spec because setup differs for issues and MRs
        specifically in the "closed" factory to use.
      
      * Add MergeRequestObserver. Parallels IssueObserver in almost every way.
      
        Ripe for refactoring.
      
      * Rename MailerObserver to NoteObserver
      
        With merge request observing moved out of MailerObserver, all that
        was left was Note logic. Renamed to NoteObserver, added tests and
        updated application config for new observer names. Refactored
        NoteObserver to use the note's author and not rely on current_user.
      
      * Set current_user for MergeRequestObserver
      
        IssueObserver and MergeRequestObserver are the only observers that
        need a reference to the current_user that they cannot look up on
        the objects they are observing.
      16ceae89
  25. Oct 02, 2012
  26. Sep 27, 2012
Loading