- Jan 23, 2018
-
-
Jan Provaznik authored
Search query is especially slow if a user searches a generic string which matches many records, in such case search can take tens of seconds or time out. To speed up the search query, we search only for first 1000 records, if there is >1000 matching records we just display "1000+" instead of precise total count supposing that with such amount the exact count is not so important for the user. Because for issues even limited search was not fast enough, 2-phase approach is used for issues: first we use simpler/faster query to get all public issues, if this exceeds the limit, we just return the limit. If the amount of matching results is lower than limit, we re-run more complex search query (which includes also confidential issues). Re-running the complex query should be fast enough in such case because the amount of matching issues is lower than limit. Because exact total_count is now limited, this patch also switches to to "prev/next" pagination. Related #40540
-
- Jan 21, 2018
-
-
Mark Fletcher authored
-
- Jan 17, 2018
-
-
Douwe Maan authored
[10.3] Migrate `can_push` column from `keys` to `deploy_keys_project` See merge request gitlab/gitlabhq!2276 (cherry picked from commit f6ca52d31bac350a23938e0aebf717c767b4710c) 1f2bd3c0 Backport to 10.3
-
Stan Hu authored
Merge branch 'security-10-3-do-not-expose-passwords-or-tokens-in-service-integrations-api' into 'security-10-3' Filter out sensitive fields from the project services API See merge request gitlab/gitlabhq!2281 (cherry picked from commit 476f2576444632f2a9a61b4cead9c1077f2c81d7) 2bcbbda0 Filter out sensitive fields from the project services API
-
- Jan 15, 2018
-
-
Matija Čupić authored
-
- Jan 14, 2018
-
-
Matija Čupić authored
-
- Jan 13, 2018
-
-
Matija Čupić authored
The N+1 issue was caused by loading the job_artifacts_archive for each job (build) individually. Including that in the builds AssociationRelation fixed the issue.
-
- Jan 11, 2018
-
-
- Jan 09, 2018
-
-
- Jan 08, 2018
-
-
Yorick Peterse authored
This removes all usage of soft removals except for the "pending delete" system implemented for projects. This in turn simplifies all the query plans of the models that used soft removals. Since we don't really use soft removals for anything useful there's no point in keeping it around. This _does_ mean that hard removals of issues (which only admins can do if I'm not mistaken) can influence the "iid" values, but that code is broken to begin with. More on this (and how to fix it) can be found in https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/31114. Fixes https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/37447
-
- Jan 04, 2018
-
-
Felipe Artur authored
-
- Dec 19, 2017
-
-
Robert Speicher authored
Previously, this would include the entire User record in the update hash, which was rendered in the response using `to_json`, erroneously exposing every attribute of that record, including their (now removed) private token. Now we only include the user ID, and perform the lookup on-demand.
-
- Nov 23, 2017
-
-
- Nov 16, 2017
-
-
Jacopo authored
Adds a rubocop rule (with autocorrect) to ensure line break after guard clauses.
-
- Nov 08, 2017
-
-
Douwe Maan authored
Use Commit#notes and Note.for_commit_id when possible to make sure we use all the indexes available to us
-
- Nov 06, 2017
-
-
Shinya Maeda authored
-
Shinya Maeda authored
-
Shinya Maeda authored
-
Rémy Coutable authored
Mitigate a N+1 requests to Gitaly problem. Still one left. Signed-off-by:
Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
-
- Oct 13, 2017
-
-
Matt Coleman authored
-
Alejandro Rodríguez authored
Having a distinct class just for that was a bit overkill
-
Alejandro Rodríguez authored
Rename classes to (hopefully) clearer names while we're doing that.
-
Alejandro Rodríguez authored
-
- Oct 12, 2017
-
-
Guilherme Vieira authored
-
- Oct 05, 2017
-
-
Vitaliy @blackst0ne Klachkov authored
-
- Sep 07, 2017
-
-
Tiago Botelho authored
-
- Sep 06, 2017
-
-
Yorick Peterse authored
This finishes the procedure for migrating events from the old format into the new format. Code no longer uses the old setup and the database tables used during the migration process are swapped, with the old table being dropped. While the database migration can be reversed this will 1) take a lot of time as data has to be coped around 2) won't restore data in the "events.data" column as we have no way of restoring this. Fixes https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/37241
-
Ashley Dumaine authored
-
Ashley Dumaine authored
-
- Sep 04, 2017
-
-
Shinya Maeda authored
-
Shinya Maeda authored
-
Shinya Maeda authored
-
Shinya Maeda authored
-
Shinya Maeda authored
-
- Aug 16, 2017
-
-
Zeger-Jan van de Weg authored
Main feature was the deprication of the Hashie stuff, so the access by calling keys as method is gone now.
-
- Aug 14, 2017
-
-
Robert Speicher authored
An upcoming update to rubocop-gitlab-security added additional violations.
-
Yorick Peterse authored
The number of forks of a project doesn't change very frequently and running a COUNT(*) every time this information is requested can be quite expensive. We also end up running such a COUNT(*) query at least twice on the homepage of a project. By caching this data and refreshing it when necessary we can reduce project homepage loading times by around 60 milliseconds (based on the timings of https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce).
-
- Aug 10, 2017
-
-
Yorick Peterse authored
This commit migrates events data in such a way that push events are stored much more efficiently. This is done by creating a shadow table called "events_for_migration", and a table called "push_event_payloads" which is used for storing push data of push events. The background migration in this commit will copy events from the "events" table into the "events_for_migration" table, push events in will also have a row created in "push_event_payloads". This approach allows us to reclaim space in the next release by simply swapping the "events" and "events_for_migration" tables, then dropping the old events (now "events_for_migration") table. The new table structure is also optimised for storage space, and does not include the unused "title" column nor the "data" column (since this data is moved to "push_event_payloads"). == Newly Created Events Newly created events are inserted into both "events" and "events_for_migration", both using the exact same primary key value. The table "push_event_payloads" in turn has a foreign key to the _shadow_ table. This removes the need for recreating and validating the foreign key after swapping the tables. Since the shadow table also has a foreign key to "projects.id" we also don't have to worry about orphaned rows. This approach however does require some additional storage as we're duplicating a portion of the events data for at least 1 release. The exact amount is hard to estimate, but for GitLab.com this is expected to be between 10 and 20 GB at most. The background migration in this commit deliberately does _not_ update the "events" table as doing so would put a lot of pressure on PostgreSQL's auto vacuuming system. == Supporting Both Old And New Events Application code has also been adjusted to support push events using both the old and new data formats. This is done by creating a PushEvent class which extends the regular Event class. Using Rails' Single Table Inheritance system we can ensure the right class is used for the right data, which in this case is based on the value of `events.action`. To support displaying old and new data at the same time the PushEvent class re-defines a few methods of the Event class, falling back to their original implementations for push events in the old format. Once all existing events have been migrated the various push event related methods can be removed from the Event model, and the calls to `super` can be removed from the methods in the PushEvent model. The UI and event atom feed have also been slightly changed to better handle this new setup, fortunately only a few changes were necessary to make this work. == API Changes The API only displays push data of events in the new format. Supporting both formats in the API is a bit more difficult compared to the UI. Since the old push data was not really well documented (apart from one example that used an incorrect "action" nmae) I decided that supporting both was not worth the effort, especially since events will be migrated in a few days _and_ new events are created in the correct format.
-
- Aug 09, 2017
-
-
Rémy Coutable authored
Signed-off-by:
Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
-
- Aug 03, 2017
-
-
Toon Claes authored
TodoService should not call `.select(&:id)` on todos, because this is bad performance. So instead use sub-queries, which will result in a single SQL query to the database. https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/development/sql.html#plucking-ids
-