- Oct 09, 2013
-
-
Boyan Tabakov authored
Added test for the FlowdockService.
-
Dmitriy Zaporozhets authored
-
Izaak Alpert authored
fixed a test a broke in the configurable theme PR Change-Id: Id894506941bc01ab0d259d48ca7ff9b80bb2c57e
-
Izaak Alpert authored
GITLAB-1262 Change-Id: I690cb8ea294df53ebe8405a519c23c501af2c21a Conflicts: app/models/user.rb config/initializers/1_settings.rb spec/models/user_spec.rb
-
Hiroyuki Sato authored
-
Dmitriy Zaporozhets authored
-
Hiroyuki Sato authored
-
Izaak Alpert authored
-calling build_user will now apply defaults and only override them if as: :admin is set Change-Id: Id1d938c0967752ecc14370af54f2d88128d18c44
-
Stephen Holdaway authored
-
Izaak Alpert authored
Change-Id: I305266fe9acbbb5136adeeb52e7e4e1d6629a30a
-
- Aug 25, 2013
-
-
ash wilson authored
Any mention of Issues, MergeRequests, or Commits via GitLab-flavored markdown references in descriptions, titles, or attached Notes creates a back-reference Note that links to the original referencer. Furthermore, pushing commits with commit messages that match a (configurable) regexp to a project's default branch will close any issues mentioned by GFM in the matched closing phrase. If accepting a merge request would close any Issues in this way, a banner is appended to the merge request's main panel to indicate this.
-
- Aug 21, 2013
-
-
Dmitriy Zaporozhets authored
-
Dmitriy Zaporozhets authored
-
Dmitriy Zaporozhets authored
-
- Aug 20, 2013
-
-
Dmitriy Zaporozhets authored
-
Dmitriy Zaporozhets authored
-
- Aug 13, 2013
-
-
Dmitriy Zaporozhets authored
-
- Aug 09, 2013
-
-
Ronald van Eede authored
-
- Jul 29, 2013
-
-
Johannes Schleifenbaum authored
-
- Jul 18, 2013
-
-
Izaak Alpert authored
-Made the api method a little more readable -removed some missed extra newline's Change-Id: Ic38baafc813aaeda0a8b283f39916182c8ec37d5
-
Izaak Alpert authored
The good: - You can do a merge request for a forked commit and it will merge properly (i.e. it does work). - Push events take into account merge requests on forked projects - Tests around merge_actions now present, spinach, and other rspec tests - Satellites now clean themselves up rather then recreate The questionable: - Events only know about target projects - Project's merge requests only hold on to MR's where they are the target - All operations performed in the satellite The bad: - Duplication between project's repositories and satellites (e.g. commits_between) (for reference: http://feedback.gitlab.com/forums/176466-general/suggestions/3456722-merge-requests-between-projects-repos) Fixes: Make test repos/satellites only create when needed -Spinach/Rspec now only initialize test directory, and setup stubs (things that are relatively cheap) -project_with_code, source_project_with_code, and target_project_with_code now create/destroy their repos individually -fixed remote removal -How to merge renders properly -Update emails to show project/branches -Edit MR doesn't set target branch -Fix some failures on editing/creating merge requests, added a test -Added back a test around merge request observer -Clean up project_transfer_spec, Remove duplicate enable/disable observers -Ensure satellite lock files are cleaned up, Attempted to add some testing around these as well -Signifant speed ups for tests -Update formatting ordering in notes_on_merge_requests -Remove wiki schema update Fixes for search/search results -Search results was using by_project for a list of projects, updated this to use in_projects -updated search results to reference the correct (target) project -udpated search results to print both sides of the merge request Change-Id: I19407990a0950945cc95d62089cbcc6262dab1a8
-
- Jul 17, 2013
-
-
Jacob Vosmaer (GitLab) authored
-
Jacob Vosmaer (GitLab) authored
-
- Jun 26, 2013
-
-
Dmitriy Zaporozhets authored
-
- Jun 22, 2013
-
-
Dmitriy Zaporozhets authored
-
Dmitriy Zaporozhets authored
Remove unnecessary projects order on User#show
-
- Jun 21, 2013
-
-
Dmitriy Zaporozhets authored
-
- Jun 19, 2013
-
-
Dmitriy Zaporozhets authored
-
- Jun 18, 2013
-
-
Dmitriy Zaporozhets authored
-
Dmitriy Zaporozhets authored
-
Dmitriy Zaporozhets authored
-
Dmitriy Zaporozhets authored
-
Dmitriy Zaporozhets authored
-
- Jun 11, 2013
-
-
Dmitriy Zaporozhets authored
-
- Jun 05, 2013
-
-
babatakao authored
500 error was occured in the following steps: 1. user1 creates new team "team1". 2. Assign team1 to project1. 3. Sign in as admin. This admin is not a member of team1. 4. Open project1 team setting page (/project1/team). 5. Click "team1" link in "Assigned teams" area. 6. 500 error. Fixed this issue.
-
- Jun 04, 2013
-
-
babatakao authored
-
- May 23, 2013
-
-
Dmitriy Zaporozhets authored
-
- May 16, 2013
-
-
Dmitry Medvinsky authored
“Can create groups” and “Can create teams” had hardcoded defaults to `true`. Sometimes it is desirable to prohibit these for newly created users by default.
-
- May 06, 2013
-
-
Dmitriy Zaporozhets authored
-
Dmitriy Zaporozhets authored
-