- Oct 09, 2013
-
-
Dmitriy Zaporozhets authored
Because notes scope was not limited by project in MergeRequest#mr_and_commit_notes it causes comments from project A appears in discussions for MR in project B.
-
Dmitriy Zaporozhets authored
-
Dmitriy Zaporozhets authored
-
- Aug 25, 2013
-
-
ash wilson authored
Any mention of Issues, MergeRequests, or Commits via GitLab-flavored markdown references in descriptions, titles, or attached Notes creates a back-reference Note that links to the original referencer. Furthermore, pushing commits with commit messages that match a (configurable) regexp to a project's default branch will close any issues mentioned by GFM in the matched closing phrase. If accepting a merge request would close any Issues in this way, a banner is appended to the merge request's main panel to indicate this.
-
- Aug 21, 2013
-
-
Dmitriy Zaporozhets authored
-
Dmitriy Zaporozhets authored
-
- Aug 19, 2013
-
-
Dmitriy Zaporozhets authored
-
- Aug 08, 2013
-
-
Dmitriy Zaporozhets authored
-
Dmitriy Zaporozhets authored
-
- Aug 05, 2013
-
-
Dmitriy Zaporozhets authored
-
- Jul 18, 2013
-
-
Izaak Alpert authored
-Some changes around calling origional methods for !for_fork? merge requests. Other changes to follow Change-Id: I009c716ce2475b9efa3fd07aee9215fca7a1c150
-
Izaak Alpert authored
-Removed many extra spaces I added -Fixed email templates to be consistent/better looking GITLAB-894, GITLAB-895, (GITLAB-858) Change-Id: I35c1a8e0e22af7de26d54e5c3da987fa7bb3921e
-
Izaak Alpert authored
Trying to retrigger travis Change-Id: Ifd86fb4c6b2791ad176230254fbf69a9ade979fb
-
Izaak Alpert authored
-The forked merge request test now tests it's componenets again, and seems to work every time (did this by reordering the branch updates so their is more time for update_branches to run) -- this could still technically fail, but after several runs it doesn't seem to. -Removed todo in merge_request, pushed wrapping of grit down to the satellite -updated action test to check flock status, made it nolonger pending -moved all logging on failure to helper method in satellite GITLAB-592 Change-Id: If0554ca35eedc3d3e8461f7d93d4b3939fa2cd75
-
Izaak Alpert authored
The good: - You can do a merge request for a forked commit and it will merge properly (i.e. it does work). - Push events take into account merge requests on forked projects - Tests around merge_actions now present, spinach, and other rspec tests - Satellites now clean themselves up rather then recreate The questionable: - Events only know about target projects - Project's merge requests only hold on to MR's where they are the target - All operations performed in the satellite The bad: - Duplication between project's repositories and satellites (e.g. commits_between) (for reference: http://feedback.gitlab.com/forums/176466-general/suggestions/3456722-merge-requests-between-projects-repos) Fixes: Make test repos/satellites only create when needed -Spinach/Rspec now only initialize test directory, and setup stubs (things that are relatively cheap) -project_with_code, source_project_with_code, and target_project_with_code now create/destroy their repos individually -fixed remote removal -How to merge renders properly -Update emails to show project/branches -Edit MR doesn't set target branch -Fix some failures on editing/creating merge requests, added a test -Added back a test around merge request observer -Clean up project_transfer_spec, Remove duplicate enable/disable observers -Ensure satellite lock files are cleaned up, Attempted to add some testing around these as well -Signifant speed ups for tests -Update formatting ordering in notes_on_merge_requests -Remove wiki schema update Fixes for search/search results -Search results was using by_project for a list of projects, updated this to use in_projects -updated search results to reference the correct (target) project -udpated search results to print both sides of the merge request Change-Id: I19407990a0950945cc95d62089cbcc6262dab1a8
-
- Jul 08, 2013
-
-
Dmitriy Zaporozhets authored
-
- Jun 19, 2013
-
-
Dmitriy Zaporozhets authored
-
- Jun 14, 2013
-
-
Dmitriy Zaporozhets authored
-
Dmitriy Zaporozhets authored
-
Dmitriy Zaporozhets authored
-
- May 22, 2013
-
-
Dmitriy Zaporozhets authored
-
Dmitriy Zaporozhets authored
-
- Apr 15, 2013
-
-
Dmitriy Zaporozhets authored
-
- Apr 02, 2013
-
-
Dmitriy Zaporozhets authored
-
Dmitriy Zaporozhets authored
-
Dmitriy Zaporozhets authored
-
- Mar 31, 2013
-
-
Dmitriy Zaporozhets authored
-
Dmitriy Zaporozhets authored
-
- Mar 15, 2013
-
-
Dmitriy Zaporozhets authored
-
- Feb 27, 2013
-
-
Dmitriy Zaporozhets authored
-
- Feb 21, 2013
-
-
Dmitriy Zaporozhets authored
-
- Feb 20, 2013
-
-
Andrew8xx8 authored
-
Andrew8xx8 authored
-
Andrew8xx8 authored
-
- Feb 19, 2013
-
-
Dmitriy Zaporozhets authored
-
- Feb 18, 2013
-
-
Andrew8xx8 authored
-
Andrew8xx8 authored
-
Andrew8xx8 authored
-
Andrew8xx8 authored
-
- Feb 13, 2013
-
-
Andrew8xx8 authored
-