Performance Reviews
Merge request reports
Activity
added 1 commit
- 4bc092b3 - Revisions to Performance Review Process for 2016
assigned to @sytses
@sytses Let's discuss this at our meeting this afternoon. I would like to announce this on the team call tomorrow. Thks!
- Resolved by Joan Parrow
- Resolved by Joan Parrow
- Resolved by Joan Parrow
- Resolved by Joan Parrow
- Resolved by Joan Parrow
- Resolved by Joan Parrow
Thanks for the review @rspeicher
assigned to @jparrow
added 1 commit
- 1af7cbdb - Change q and a wording to include merit increase connection
added 1 commit
- 52a5c3bf - Removed ratings pending completion of definitions
@rspeicher Can you help me insert a table into this MR? Let me know and I'll email you the ratings and definition table to insert in the Q & A sections to replace placeholder. Thanks!
@jparrow Happy to! Check out https://help.github.com/articles/organizing-information-with-tables/ which explains the syntax well, and if you still need help just ask.
Thanks @rspeicher I'll give it a try. Too bad I can't cheat and copy and paste my table! If I mess it up too bad, I'll holler for help.
Hey @rspeicher could you take a quick look to see if I did the table correctly and if any fixes are needed?? Thks very much!!
@jparrow If you click the Changes tab in this MR, and then View file @ [something] you can preview how it will look.
It mostly looks correct, but I'm not sure why the left-hand column surrounds everything with colons. If you're trying to align things like suggested in the documentation, note that you only add those colons to the "header row", that is, the row of hyphens just below the column headers.
Also it looks like
|-----|-----|
is included at the end of the table, which shouldn't be necessary.added 1132 commits
-
bb95cf67...dbd54224 - 1131 commits from branch
master
- a92bbe22 - resolve conflicts
-
bb95cf67...dbd54224 - 1131 commits from branch
mentioned in commit fc2120dc
85 86 **Q: When are performance reviews due?** 87 88 **A:** All reviews must be completed by end of day (EST) Wednesday, April 19, 2017. 89 90 **Q: Will we have an opportunity to review and compare self and manager reviews?** 91 92 **A:** Yes, managers will receive a copy of self reviews as they are completed. After all managers are finished, we will close the 2016 review cycle and share manager reviews with their direct reports to facilitate open and meaningful dialog around alignment and differences between manager and self reviews. Performance gaps identified should generate productive development conversations. 93 94 **Managers:** 95 In cases where you’ve identified your top performer, we should learn from what makes that person successful to share with others. 96 In cases where below average performance is identified, you should plan to deliver a PIP to clearly identify performance gaps and expected changes. 97 98 **Q: Why link performance to the increase process?** 99 100 **A:** Cost of living adjustments (COLA) encourage participation, generate mediocrity and lead to the disengagement of high performers, while performance-based (merit) increases reward results and motivate continued development and higher achievements.