Skip to content

Use favicon full path

What does this MR do?

Use favicon full path so we don't trip when name is content hashed

Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?

Why was this MR needed?

Screenshots (if relevant)

2017-04-13_11.11.28

(that little flicker isn't consistent, must be because the dev favicon is added async too :))

Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?

What are the relevant issue numbers?

Merge request reports