Fix unassigned checkmark
What does this MR do?
- Fixes regression with selecting
Unassigned
in the Assignee dropdown when filtering Issuables
Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
Make sure there are no unwanted side effects
Why was this MR needed?
Fixes regression
Screenshots (if relevant)
Before | After |
---|---|
![]() |
![]() |
Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
-
Changelog entry added, if necessary -
Documentation created/updated -
API support added - Tests
-
Added for this feature/bug -
All builds are passing
-
-
Conform by the merge request performance guides -
Conform by the style guides -
Branch has no merge conflicts with master
(if it does - rebase it please) -
Squashed related commits together
What are the relevant issue numbers?
Closes #31843 (closed)
Merge request reports
Activity
- Resolved by Phil Hughes
- Resolved by Phil Hughes
- Resolved by Phil Hughes
added 122 commits
-
17caba91...cae08033 - 120 commits from branch
master
- ee2db2c1 - Fix unassigned checkmark
- 37a76e8e - Fix eslint
-
17caba91...cae08033 - 120 commits from branch
added ~149423 frontend labels
changed milestone to %9.2
assigned to @iamphill
mentioned in merge request !11147 (closed)
Just the one question @ClemMakesApps I understand though that the GL dropdown is a bit of a mess
assigned to @ClemMakesApps
added 57 commits
-
70f4aaae...0bc2fef9 - 54 commits from branch
master
- 72b7e48d - Fix unassigned checkmark
- 8fc68b68 - Fix eslint
- 0654955f - Add spec
Toggle commit list-
70f4aaae...0bc2fef9 - 54 commits from branch
assigned to @iamphill
mentioned in commit 2242a2d7
added regression label
mentioned in commit f12d7db1
mentioned in merge request !11528 (merged)
@ClemMakesApps: This MR doesn't apply cleanly onto
9-2-stable
. Could you please fix the conflicts in https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/merge_requests/11528?