Skip to content

Hide read_registry scope when registry is disabled on instance

What does this MR do?

Hides the read_registry scope when the internal registry is not enabled

Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?

Is there a better way to code the spec changes without doing the load? The actual fix here is clean and straightforward, but these spec changes make it feel like a hack. Eager to hear feedback here. Thanks!

Why was this MR needed?

We don't have the registry enabled on our instance. I think showing the read_registry option in this case is confusing to users.

Screenshots (if relevant)

Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?

What are the relevant issue numbers?

Edited by username-removed-1113013

Merge request reports

Loading