Skip to content

Use limit parameter rather than hardcoded value

What does this MR do?

Fix bug 15344, so that the limit parameter that is already passed in to the print_users function is actually used, rather than using a hardcoded value.

Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?

No, it is a trivial change.

Why was this MR needed?

This bug causes 100 LDAP users to be displayed even when a different limit is given, which can be annoying.

What are the relevant issue numbers?

#15344 (closed)

Screenshots (if relevant)

N/A

Merge request reports