What does this MR do?
Before, we showed the
committed_date of commits in commits list, but
authored_date in the commit. This could be confusing as for both
we prefix the date by
Unless you guys have an opinion about this and intentionally show committed or authored dates depending on the view, I think this might be confusing and I think the
committed_date should be the prevalent. Authored date could be also shown in the commit show view as an additional detail.
In the same vein, I'd suggest to group commits in commits list by authored date and not committed date, but this could be discussed in a separate issue.
NB: In the wiki related views, we show
authored_date and it makes more sense as we want to show the last updated date.
Screenshots (if relevant)
Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
CHANGELOG entry added
API support added
Added for this feature/bug
All builds are passing
Conform by the style guides
Branch has no merge conflicts with
master(if you do - rebase it please)
Squashed related commits together