Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Select Git revision
  • move-gl-dropdown
  • improve-table-pagination-spec
  • move-markdown-preview
  • winh-fix-merge-request-spec
  • master default
  • index-namespaces-lower-name
  • winh-single-karma-test
  • 10-3-stable
  • 36782-replace-team-user-role-with-add_role-user-in-specs
  • winh-modal-internal-state
  • tz-ide-file-icons
  • 38869-milestone-select
  • update-autodevops-template
  • jivl-activate-repo-cookie-preferences
  • qa-add-deploy-key
  • docs-move-article-ldap
  • 40780-choose-file
  • 22643-manual-job-page
  • refactor-cluster-show-page-conservative
  • dm-sidekiq-versioning
  • v10.4.0.pre
  • v10.3.0
  • v10.3.0-rc5
  • v10.3.0-rc4
  • v10.3.0-rc3
  • v10.3.0-rc2
  • v10.2.5
  • v10.3.0-rc1
  • v10.0.7
  • v10.1.5
  • v10.2.4
  • v10.2.3
  • v10.2.2
  • v10.2.1
  • v10.3.0.pre
  • v10.2.0
  • v10.2.0-rc4
  • v10.2.0-rc3
  • v10.1.4
  • v10.2.0-rc2
40 results

system_note_service.rb

Forked from GitLab.org / GitLab FOSS
Source project has a limited visibility.
  • Zeger-Jan van de Weg's avatar
    70ca3370
    \#to_branch_name now uses the iid as postfix · 70ca3370
    Zeger-Jan van de Weg authored
    Given the branch name 'mep-mep' with an iid being 1,
    the current way, master's way, would yield a branch name of
    1-mep-mep. The problem for larger projects however would be that
    a developer might forget what iid the issue was.
    
    When this developer would try to tab complete it would:
    - Or result in 20+ branches possibly
    - Or start with the wrong digit, try again with digit++
      - Would see 20 branches, repeat
    
    Thus the obvious way of solving this is letting the dev tab complete
    on the issue title, which is easier to remember.
    70ca3370
    History
    \#to_branch_name now uses the iid as postfix
    Zeger-Jan van de Weg authored
    Given the branch name 'mep-mep' with an iid being 1,
    the current way, master's way, would yield a branch name of
    1-mep-mep. The problem for larger projects however would be that
    a developer might forget what iid the issue was.
    
    When this developer would try to tab complete it would:
    - Or result in 20+ branches possibly
    - Or start with the wrong digit, try again with digit++
      - Would see 20 branches, repeat
    
    Thus the obvious way of solving this is letting the dev tab complete
    on the issue title, which is easier to remember.