Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Select Git revision
  • move-gl-dropdown
  • improve-table-pagination-spec
  • move-markdown-preview
  • winh-fix-merge-request-spec
  • master default
  • index-namespaces-lower-name
  • winh-single-karma-test
  • 10-3-stable
  • 36782-replace-team-user-role-with-add_role-user-in-specs
  • winh-modal-internal-state
  • tz-ide-file-icons
  • 38869-milestone-select
  • update-autodevops-template
  • jivl-activate-repo-cookie-preferences
  • qa-add-deploy-key
  • docs-move-article-ldap
  • 40780-choose-file
  • 22643-manual-job-page
  • refactor-cluster-show-page-conservative
  • dm-sidekiq-versioning
  • v10.4.0.pre
  • v10.3.0
  • v10.3.0-rc5
  • v10.3.0-rc4
  • v10.3.0-rc3
  • v10.3.0-rc2
  • v10.2.5
  • v10.3.0-rc1
  • v10.0.7
  • v10.1.5
  • v10.2.4
  • v10.2.3
  • v10.2.2
  • v10.2.1
  • v10.3.0.pre
  • v10.2.0
  • v10.2.0-rc4
  • v10.2.0-rc3
  • v10.1.4
  • v10.2.0-rc2
40 results

cache.rake

Forked from GitLab.org / GitLab FOSS
Source project has a limited visibility.
  • Jacob Vosmaer's avatar
    a3109012
    Batch size >1000 does not pay off · a3109012
    Jacob Vosmaer authored
    We did a small experiment to see how a full scan of the Redis keys on
    gitlab.com speeds up as we increase the batch size. The values on the
    right are time in seconds for a full scan (no delete operations).
    
    count: 10);      284.500529021
    count: 100);      86.21216934
    count: 1_000);    60.931676195
    count: 10_000);   60.96355610
    count: 100_000);  62.378172541
    
    It looks like 1,000 is a good number.
    a3109012
    History
    Batch size >1000 does not pay off
    Jacob Vosmaer authored
    We did a small experiment to see how a full scan of the Redis keys on
    gitlab.com speeds up as we increase the batch size. The values on the
    right are time in seconds for a full scan (no delete operations).
    
    count: 10);      284.500529021
    count: 100);      86.21216934
    count: 1_000);    60.931676195
    count: 10_000);   60.96355610
    count: 100_000);  62.378172541
    
    It looks like 1,000 is a good number.