Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Select Git revision
  • move-gl-dropdown
  • improve-table-pagination-spec
  • move-markdown-preview
  • winh-fix-merge-request-spec
  • master default
  • index-namespaces-lower-name
  • winh-single-karma-test
  • 10-3-stable
  • 36782-replace-team-user-role-with-add_role-user-in-specs
  • winh-modal-internal-state
  • tz-ide-file-icons
  • 38869-milestone-select
  • update-autodevops-template
  • jivl-activate-repo-cookie-preferences
  • qa-add-deploy-key
  • docs-move-article-ldap
  • 40780-choose-file
  • 22643-manual-job-page
  • refactor-cluster-show-page-conservative
  • dm-sidekiq-versioning
  • v10.4.0.pre
  • v10.3.0
  • v10.3.0-rc5
  • v10.3.0-rc4
  • v10.3.0-rc3
  • v10.3.0-rc2
  • v10.2.5
  • v10.3.0-rc1
  • v10.0.7
  • v10.1.5
  • v10.2.4
  • v10.2.3
  • v10.2.2
  • v10.2.1
  • v10.3.0.pre
  • v10.2.0
  • v10.2.0-rc4
  • v10.2.0-rc3
  • v10.1.4
  • v10.2.0-rc2
40 results

spec

  • Clone with SSH
  • Clone with HTTPS
    • Forked from GitLab.org / GitLab FOSS
    20361 commits behind the upstream repository.
    Jacob Vosmaer (GitLab)'s avatar
    Merge branch 'expire-branch-cache-after-gc' into 'master'
    Jacob Vosmaer (GitLab) authored 
    Expire the branch cache after `git gc` runs

Due to a stale NFS cache, it's possible that a branch lookup fails while `git gc` is running and causes missing branches in merge requests.

I'm not totally convinced this is the right solution, but since we and our customers are experiencing this issue quite frequently, I'm taking a stab at it.

Possible workaround for #15392


See merge request !5160
    97999fd4
    History
    Jacob Vosmaer (GitLab)'s avatar 97999fd4
    History